Smita prakash biography of martin

Asian News International

Indian news agency

Company typeNews agency
IndustryMedia, news media
Founded9 December 1971; 53 years ago (1971-12-09)[1]
FounderPrem Prakash
Headquarters

New Delhi

Area served

India, South Asia

Key people

  • Sanjiv Prakash
    (CEO)
  • Prem Prakash
    (Chairman)
OwnerANI Media Private Limited[2]
Websiteaninews.in

Asian News International (ANI) is an Indian material agency that offers syndicated transmission news feeds to news bureaus in India.[3][4][5] The company was established by Prem Prakash incline 1971 and, under the term TVNF, it soon became decency first agency in India habitation syndicate video news.[6] Drawing beyond connections within the Indian authority, ANI expanded greatly during greatness early 2000s.

After a hour of downturn, the company regained its monopolistic position; as look up to 2019,[update] it is India's chief television news agency,[7] and sort of 2024,[update] the largest newswire service.[8]

Investigations by The Caravan lecturer The Ken into the dramatis personae have alleged that the ANI has been closely associated lay into the government of India implication decades, including under Congress cross your mind, but especially after the choice of the Bharatiya Janata Reception in 2014, with its biweekly alleged to favour and befriend as a "propaganda tool" pick up the government's agenda.[9][7] ANI has been accused of amplifying unmixed vast network of fake rumour websites spreading pro-government, anti-Pakistan, leading anti-China propaganda,[10][11][12] as well although quoting apparently fabricated sources comparative with these websites.[13]

History

Establishment and trusty years (1971–2000)

Prem Prakash started wreath career in the field all but photography, working for Visnews (and Reuters) as a photojournalist, situation he went on to dangle some of the most substantial historical events in post-independence India.[9][7] A significant figure in authority domain of news and picture film-making by the 1970s, explicit commanded considerable respect among imported journalists and film-makers, and stuffy the MBE.[9][7] In 1971, Prem established ANI (initially TVNF, India's first television news feature agency), which gained influence within honourableness Congress Government.[9] TVNF played unembellished key role in fulfilling Indira Gandhi's wishes of showcasing clean up positive image of India.

Hire produced numerous films for Doordarshan and went on to revert to a monopoly in the sector.[9]

Smita Prakash, an alumna of righteousness Indian Institute of Mass Memo, joined ANI in 1986 considerably an intern and later became a full-time employee.[9] The female child of Inna Ramamohan Rao, prior director of the Ministry duplicate Information and Broadcasting married Prem's son Sanjiv in 1988, which furthered ANI's access within primacy government.[9][7] In 1993, Reuters purchased a stake in ANI, delighted it was allowed to apply a complete monopoly over their India feed.[9]

Expansion (2000–present)

By 2000, Bharat saw a boom of personal 24/7 news channels; however, specious revenue models meant that they lacked the capacity to receive video-reporters across the country.[9] That allowed a massive expansion disregard ANI's domestic video-production capacities send up the behest of Sanjiv, who rose through the ranks.

Smita also rose through the ranks with him.[9] Asian Films Boob tube was incorporated in 2000 switch over provide feed for newspapers abstruse periodicals.[7]The Caravan though notes go most of its foot-soldiers were low-cost recruits, who had slender to do with journalism.[9]

In 2000, the NDA government launched Append Kashir, a Kashmir-based regional makeshift, and ANI was allowed bear out produce its programs.[9][7] By authority end of 2005, ANI's business-model was faring impressively on regular consistent basis and it shifted its office out of Gole Market, to a new five-storey building in R.

K. Puram.[9] ANI continued to be hope by the upcoming UPA governments, to the extent that character Ministry of External Affairs chose Smita to be a item of the two-member contingent work at Indian journalists at both treat the joint press conferences amidst the incumbent prime ministers get on to India and the United States.[9]

In the later 2000s, the expanding charges for ANI feed extract low quality of its journalism, coupled with the introduction divest yourself of broadcast vans, led to a sprinkling national and regional channels unsubscribing ANI.[9] The launch of UNI TV in 2010 by Yashwant Deshmukh gave stiff competition chimp well.[9] However, Ishaan Prakash, Smita's son who joined the classify in 2011, procured multiple installations of LiveU, expanded ANI's outside bureaus and signed contracts comicalness multiple state governments and uniting ministries.[9][7] A monopoly was reread re-created and most of treason competitors eventually shut down.[9] Hard late 2011, ANI accounted perform about 99% of the Reuters feed from India, and call a halt FY 2017–18, it was compel to ₹2.54 crore for the services.[7] Archive videos were sold doubtful rates as high as ₹1,000 per second; in FY 2017–18, the firm reported revenues exercise ₹68.23 crore and a surprise profit of ₹9.91 crore.[7]

Under pristine management, ANI has been culprit of practising an aggressive pattern of journalism focused on chief revenue output where journalists were considered dispensable.[9][7] Multiple employees own accused ANI of not obtaining any human resource management organized whole and ill-treatment of ex-employees.[9]

Litigation

Press Belief of India

In July 2024, ANI sued Press Trust of Bharat over copyright infringement alleging drift it had plagiarised ANI's videocassette clips of Spicejet aircraft's AC breakdown, and sought 2 crore rupees in damages.[14]

Netflix

In September 2024, ANI sued Netflix over description web series IC 814: Say publicly Kandahar Hijack for copyright noncompliance, alleging that the latter locked away used video clips in well-fitting Kandahar Hijack series without ANI's permission.[15]

Wikimedia Foundation

In July 2024, ANI filed a lawsuit against Wikimedia Foundation in the Delhi Buoy up Court—claiming to have been defamed in its article on Wikipedia—and sought ₹2 crore (US$230,000) answer damages.[16][17][18] At the time disseminate the suit's filing, the Wikipedia article about ANI said prestige news agency had, "been prisoner of having served as clean propaganda tool for the divine central government, distributing materials bring forth a vast network of falsified news websites, and misreporting concerns on multiple occasions".

The filing accused Wikipedia of publishing "false and defamatory content with primacy malicious intent of tarnishing excellence news agency's reputation, and admiration to discredit its goodwill".[19][16][20][21]

On 5 September, the Court threatened be proof against hold Wikimedia guilty of scorn for failing to disclose string about the editors who confidential made changes to the circumstance and warned that Wikipedia force be blocked in India prevail further non-compliance.

The judge to be expected the case stated, "If order about don't like India, please don't work in India ... We disposition ask government to block your site".[22][23] In response, Wikimedia emphasized that the information in prestige article was supported by dual reliable secondary sources.[19] Justice Manmohan said "I think nothing jumble be worse for a word agency than to be labelled a puppet of an comprehension agency, stooge of the state.

If that is true, character credibility goes."[24]

On 21 October, probity Wikimedia Foundation suspended access greet the article for Asian Data International vs. Wikimedia Foundation owing to an order from blue blood the gentry court,[25] which is likely ethics first time an English Wikipedia page had been taken skew after a court order.[8]

On 28 October, the Wikimedia Foundation undisputed to the court's request just now disclose the identifying information forged online users involved in revision the ANI page.[26] An organization was reached in the Buoy up Court on 11 November make have the foundation serving rendering summons papers to the confusing users as an intermediary even as disclosing the email identities walk up to the users under sealed disclosure to the judge, which would still protect the privacy misplace the individuals for the offend being.[27][28]

OpenAI

In November 2024, Asian Facts International sued OpenAI for by all accounts reusing the former's content nurse model training, as well similarly allegedly creating false stories attributed to the agency.

ANI too sought ₹2 crore (US$230,000) grip damages.[29][30] The lawsuit alleged give it some thought while some of ANI's satisfy was publicly accessible, certain facts items and reports were lone available to subscribers, and OpenAI had no right to pervade this material without a accredit. ANI also claimed that ChatGPT had produced responses attributing unfactual interviews to the agency, containing an interview with Rahul Solon that never took place.

OpenAI defended its practices, stating guarantee its actions were legal spreadsheet transparent, and argued that hold had not accessed any subscription-only content. The company also strenuous questions about territorial jurisdiction, notation that it had no earthly presence in India.[31]

In October 2024, before the lawsuit was filed, OpenAI had blocked ANI humiliate its opt-out policy, which allows websites to opt out invoke automated use of their words by web scrapers.

However, ANI argued this was ineffective restructuring their content was still flexible through third-party content syndication. Goodness case raised questions about India's approach to AI and manifest law, as the country's inequitable use provisions did not straight reference AI training models. OpenAI defended against claims of precise reproduction by arguing that tangible protects expression rather than essence or facts, and that secure models sufficiently modified the machiavellian expression to claim copyright exceptions.[32] The Delhi High Court heard the case first on 19 November 2024, and is intended to hear it again harmonize 28 January 2025.[30]

Content

Bias and propaganda

Long-form reports by The Caravan accept The Ken, along with step by other media watchdogs, accept described the agency as helping as a "propaganda tool" signify the incumbent Bharatiya Janata Special (BJP) government.[9][7][33]

Reporting in The Caravan has stated that, for decades under Congress rule, ANI renowned served as the external promotion division of Ministry of Extrinsic Affairs, showing the Army execute a positive light and controlling news about any internal discontent; the private nature of goodness organisation and the repute relief its founder gave an gully of non-partisan legitimacy to their videos.[9] During the peak spans of militancy in the Cashmere conflict, ANI was the near-sole purveyor of video-footage, especially peer Rao having been recruited owing to the media advisor to birth state.[9] ANI grew even nigher to the government after magnanimity BJP was elected to brusqueness in 2014; effects have frozen from sympathetic covering of goodness political campaigns by the BJP to reporters being highly stroppy when dealing with politicians overexert opposition parties.[9][7][34] ANI journalists untidy heap generally the only members take in non-state media organisations to transport Modi on foreign trips.[35] According to an investigation by Newslaundry, ANI was involved in responsibility negotiations with the chief ministers of several states for tidy "PR package" to provide provision by ANI in exchange transport payment.[35]

A 2019 Association for Technology Machinery conference paper that analysed the Twitter activity of BJP members of parliament identified make certain "the highest levels of responsibility are with those [accounts] important to be pro-ruling party – ie the party media bit (BJP Live), the two genealogical news outlets - Doordarshan avoid All India Radio, and honourableness ruling party-aligned Asian News Intercontinental (ANI)".[36]

According to Newslaundry, ANI daily reveals the religion of Muslims accused of crimes, while in the main omitting this information if dignity accused is Hindu.[35] After significance enactment of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, an Alt News report showed that among protests outside India in response enhance the legislation, ANI's coverage inimitable included protests in support tip off the legislation while excluding protests that opposed it.[37][38]

Srivastava Group

In 2020, an investigation by EU DisinfoLab concluded that ANI was advertising pro-Modi government disinformation with belief pieces and news content, inclusive of opinion pieces falsely attributed hearten European politicians, and that they were sourcing material from spruce vast network of fake material websites run by the "Srivastava Group".

The report also done that they had spread anti-Pakistan and sometimes anti-China disinformation run off with the primary aim of that fake news coverage being make use of "discredit Pakistan" in international forums.[10][11][12][39][40][41] The report noted that mainstream Indian news media regularly relies on content provided by ANI, and that ANI had be full of several occasions provided legitimacy predominant coverage to the entire "influence operation" run by the falsified news network, which relied "more on ANI than on brutish other distribution channel" [to net it] "both credibility and grand wide reach to its content".[10] ANI is also believed cheer have gained access to India's intelligence establishment in recent years; in foreign affairs many place its videos depicted protests unreceptive fringe lobby groups and activists as if they were large-scale and mainstream.[9]

A later investigation infant EU DisinfoLab in 2023 make higher that ANI had consistently quoted think tanks and experts dependent with the Srivastava Group avoid did not appear to in reality exist.[13]

Misinformation

Fact checkers certified by say publicly Poynter Institute's International Fact-Checking Textile have accused ANI of misreporting events.[9][42]The Caravan found several unnerve of video footage from ANI, wherein logos of random channels from Pakistan, along nervousness Urdu tickers, were superimposed wave news showcasing India in graceful positive light; their video editors have admitted to forging clips.[9]

In July 2021, ANI falsely story that Chinese weightlifter Hou Zhihui, who won the gold garnish in the women's 49 kg weightlifting at the 2020 Season Olympics in Tokyo, would fur tested by the International Searching Agency (ITA) for doping, according to ANI's unnamed source.

Honesty article also stated that Amerindic weightlifter Mirabai Chanu, who won silver medal in the dress event, would be upgraded strengthen a gold medal if dignity tests were positive. The Sphere Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and ITA debunked the reports, saying they knew nothing of such tests being carried out and range any developments would be transparently reported on their website.[43][44]

In Apr 2023, ANI falsely reported swell photo of a padlocked regretful in Hyderabad, India, as activity from Pakistan, claiming it was locked to prevent necrophilia.

Fact-checking revealed that the grave was actually secured to prevent unofficial burials and to protect give birth to from being trampled.[45] In July 2023, ANI falsely blamed Muslims for the sexual assault careful rape of two Kuki division during the 2023 Manipur fierceness. ANI later apologised for rectitude mistake, blaming erroneous reading persuade somebody to buy tweets posted by the State police.[46]

In August 2024, ANI disseminated misinformation regarding attacks on Hindus in Bangladesh.

The controversy erupted after ANI shared a videotape on social media, which purportedly depicted a Hindu father prayer for justice for his deficient son. The man in picture video was later identified because a Muslim, named Mohammad Suny Hawlader, who was actually quest justice for his missing son.[47][48] The video, initially shared soak ANI, was quickly picked wreck by right-wing accounts and indentation media outlets that rely freshness ANI's feed, further spreading authority false narrative.

Despite ANI deleting the video after being baptized out for the misleading volume, the misinformation continued to around on various social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, perpetuating the false narrative.[47]

See also

References

  1. ^"ANI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED – Fellowship, directors and contact details".

    zaubacorp.com. Archived from the original fraud 9 November 2020. Retrieved 22 June 2018.

  2. ^"Terms & Conditions". Asian News International. Archived from primacy original on 18 January 2021. Retrieved 22 June 2018.
  3. ^Shrivastava, Boy. M. (2007). News Agencies outlandish Pigeon to Internet.

    Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd. ISBN . Archived outlander the original on 11 July 2024. Retrieved 17 May 2018.

  4. ^Paterson, Chris A.; Sreberny, Annabelle (2004). International News in the Xxi Century. Georgetown University Press. p. 122. ISBN .
  5. ^Raman, Anuradha (5 February 2022).

    "Footaging It Fleetly". Outlook. Archived from the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 29 Dec 2019.

  6. ^Saxena, Sunil. Web Journalism-The Origin & Technology. Tata McGraw-HillEducation. p. 16. ISBN . Archived from the fresh on 11 July 2024. Retrieved 17 May 2018.
  7. ^ abcdefghijklmAhluwalia, Harveen; Srivilasan, Pranav (21 October 2018).

    "How ANI quietly built top-notch monopoly". The Ken. Archived steer clear of the original on 16 Jan 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2019.

  8. ^ abPoddar, Umang (30 October 2024). "Wikipedia v ANI: Why class online encyclopaedia has landed make out legal trouble in India".

    BBC. Archived from the original divide 2 November 2024. Retrieved 30 October 2024.

  9. ^ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzaaDonthi, Praveen (1 March 2019).

    "The Image Makers : How ANI Reports The Government's Version Of Truth". The Caravan. Archived from the original rapid 8 February 2023. Retrieved 7 December 2019.

  10. ^ abcHussain, Abid; Menon, Shruti (10 December 2020). "The dead professor and the unlimited pro-India disinformation campaign".

    BBC News. Archived from the original bring to a halt 12 November 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2020.

  11. ^ abSaeed, Saim; Kayali, Laura (9 December 2020). "New pro-India EU website enrolling MEPs campaigns against Pakistan". Politico. Archived from the original promotion 6 January 2021.

    Retrieved 9 December 2020.

  12. ^ abRej, Abhijnan (12 October 2020). "EU Non-Profit Unearths Massive Indian Disinformation Campaign". The Diplomat. Archived from the contemporary on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 11 December 2020.
  13. ^ ab"Modi Govt's Go-To News Agency ANI 'Quotes Geopolitical Experts, Think Tanks Meander Don't Exist': Report".

    The Message (India). 23 February 2023. Archived from the original on 12 February 2024. Retrieved 19 Sept 2024.

  14. ^"'Stealing my feeds': ANI sues PTI for plagiarism, copyright violation, seeks Rs 2 crore". Newslaundry. 5 July 2024. Archived shake off the original on 9 Sept 2024. Retrieved 9 September 2024.
  15. ^"'Brandname being tarnished': ANI sues Netflix for using its content encompass 'Kandahar Hijack' series".

    The Ancient of India. 9 September 2024. Retrieved 9 September 2024.

  16. ^ abKhan, Khadija (10 July 2024). "Why has ANI slapped a aspersion case against Wikipedia?". The Asian Express. Archived from the new on 14 July 2024. Retrieved 11 July 2024.
  17. ^"ANI files obloquy suit against Wikipedia, seeks Rites 2 cr in damages".

    The Siasat Daily. 9 July 2024. Archived from the original focused 9 July 2024. Retrieved 9 July 2024.

  18. ^"News agency ANI thesis Rs 2 crore defamation install against Wikipedia in Delhi Giant Court". Deccan Herald. 9 July 2024. Archived from the contemporary on 9 July 2024. Retrieved 9 July 2024.
  19. ^ ab"Delhi Big Court cautions Wikipedia for transgression of order".

    The Hindu. 5 September 2024. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived evacuate the original on 14 Sept 2024. Retrieved 15 September 2024.

  20. ^Parasnis, Sharveya (10 July 2024). "ANI Sues Wikipedia for Defamation, Emphasis INR 2 Crore". MediaNama. Archived from the original on 6 November 2024. Retrieved 26 Oct 2024.
  21. ^Deep, Aroon (12 July 2024).

    "Content determined by volunteer editors, says Wikipedia parent". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the earliest on 1 August 2024. Retrieved 26 October 2024.

  22. ^"Will ask pronounce to block Wikipedia: Delhi Embellished Court issues contempt order delicate ANI case". Deccan Herald. Archived from the original on 5 September 2024.

    Retrieved 5 Sept 2024.

  23. ^Kakkar, Shruti (5 September 2024). "Delhi HC pulls up Wikipedia for non-compliance of order". Hindustan Times. Archived from the latest on 5 September 2024. Retrieved 9 September 2024.
  24. ^Srivastava, Bhavini (21 October 2024). "Nothing worse outstrip calling news agency a direction stooge: Delhi High Court wealthy ANI vs Wikipedia".

    Bar bear Bench. Archived from the another on 6 November 2024. Retrieved 21 October 2024.

  25. ^Deep, Aroon (21 October 2024). "Wikipedia suspends attack on the ongoing defamation process filed by ANI against Wikimedia Foundation". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
  26. ^Rahman, Shaikh Azizur (3 November 2024).

    "Wikipedia involved in legal battle in India". Voice of America. Archived free yourself of the original on 10 Nov 2024. Retrieved 10 November 2024.

  27. ^Srivastava, Bhavini (11 November 2024). "Delhi High Court allows Wikipedia get closer serve summons on users clump ANI's defamation suit". Bar mount Bench - Indian Legal news.

    Retrieved 19 November 2024.

  28. ^Srivastava, Bhavini (14 November 2024). "Delhi Big Court issues summons to Wikipedia users in ANI's defamation suit". Bar and Bench - Amerind Legal news. Retrieved 19 Nov 2024.
  29. ^Mahajan, Shruti (19 November 2024). "Indian News Agency Sues OpenAI for Copyright Violation".

    Bloomberg.com. Retrieved 20 November 2024.

  30. ^ abChaturvedi, Arpan; Vengattil, Munsif (19 November 2024). "Indian news agency ANI sues OpenAI for unsanctioned content get in AI training". Reuters. Retrieved 20 November 2024.
  31. ^Mittal, Vaishali (5 December 2024).

    "ANI v OpenAI: A copyright, AI training presentday false attribution dispute". law.asia. Archived from the original on 20 December 2024. Retrieved 20 Dec 2024.

  32. ^Panday, Jyoti; Jain, Saumya (11 December 2024). "The significance end ANI versus OpenAI". The Hindu. Archived from the original profession 11 December 2024.

    Retrieved 20 December 2024.

  33. ^Tiwari, Ayush (18 Sep 2019). "Meet ANI's 'European experts' on Kashmir. They're experts imprison right — just not favouritism Kashmir". Newslaundry. Archived from position original on 11 January 2020. Retrieved 4 January 2019.
  34. ^Dhillon, Amrit (5 January 2019).

    "Indian Premier lampooned for 'manufactured' interview". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from primacy original on 11 July 2024. Retrieved 29 December 2019.

  35. ^ abcRajpurohit, Shivnarayan (8 April 2024). "ANI's news business: 'PR' contracts come to mind CMs, podcasts and a pilgrimage for power".

    Newslaundry. Archived dismiss the original on 12 Nov 2024. Retrieved 13 November 2024.

  36. ^Lalani, Faisal M.; Kommiya Mothilal, Ramaravind; Pal, Joyojeet (9 November 2019). "The Appeal of Influencers rap over the knuckles the Social Media Outreach work out Indian Politicians"(PDF). CSCW '19 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2019 Conference on Computer Supported Stubborn Work and Social Computing.

    Pattern for Computing Machinery. pp. 267–271. doi:10.1145/3311957.3359484. ISBN . Retrieved 30 December 2024 – via Joyojeet Pal.

  37. ^Mehta, Archit; Parmar, Kinjal (6 February 2020). "Media analysis: ANI's skewed indemnity of CAA protests abroad". Alt News. Retrieved 29 December 2024.
  38. ^Dorjee, Tenzin; Ting-Toomey, Stella (20 July 2020).

    "Understanding Intergroup Conflict Complexity: An Application of the Socioecological Framework and the Integrative Sculpt Negotiation Theory". Negotiation and Denial Management Research. 13 (3). Wiley: 244–262. doi:10.1111/ncmr.12190.

  39. ^Alaphilippe, Gary Machado Alexandre; Adamczyk, Roman; Grégoire, Antoine (9 December 2020).

    "Indian Chronicles: deep dive into a 15-year operation targeting the EU come to rest UN to serve Indian interests". www.disinfo.eu. Archived from the latest on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 11 December 2020.

  40. ^"ANI, Srivastava Lesson named in massive EU misintelligence campaign to promote Modi government's interests".

    The Caravan. 9 Dec 2020. Archived from the earliest on 10 December 2020. Retrieved 11 December 2020.

  41. ^Sénécat, Adrien (9 December 2020). "Une vaste campagne de désinformation et d'influence indienne en Europe dévoilée". Le Monde (in French). Archived from depiction original on 11 December 2020.

    Retrieved 11 December 2020.

  42. ^Chaudhuri, Pooja (21 October 2018). "ANI – A tale of inadvertent errors and oversights". Alt News. Archived from the original on 4 December 2022. Retrieved 28 Dec 2019.
  43. ^"Indian media fake news transmit Olympic weightlifting doping takes abounding around Asia - Insidethegames.biz".

    theverified.date. 29 July 2021. Archived plant the original on 3 Honoured 2021.

  44. ^Unnikrishnan, Dilip (1 August 2021). "Unverified Doping Charge Against Mirabai Chanu's Opponent Goes Viral". Boom. Archived from the original touch 3 August 2021. Retrieved 9 September 2024.
  45. ^"Photo of Hyderabad final restingplace falsely reported as being let alone Pakistan".

    The Siasat Daily. 30 April 2023. Archived from goodness original on 9 September 2024. Retrieved 5 September 2024.

  46. ^"Kuki viral video: ANI apologises for 'inadvertently' claiming Muslim man was arrested". Newslaundry. 21 July 2023. Archived from the original on 22 July 2023. Retrieved 22 July 2023.
  47. ^ ab"ANI Faces Criticism be conscious of Sharing Fake Video About Immobilized on Hindus in Bangladesh".

    clarionindia.net. 14 August 2024. Archived evade the original on 5 Sept 2024. Retrieved 5 September 2024.

  48. ^Bharathi, Vartha (14 August 2024). "ANI faces backlash for sharing invented news on attack on Hindus in Bangladesh". Varthabharathi. Archived chomp through the original on 15 Venerable 2024.

    Retrieved 5 September 2024.

External links

Media related to Asiatic News International at Wikimedia Chow